Sunday, May 31, 2015

You Can Make Money in Stocks (Especially These Three) No Matter What Rates Do

It's commonly held wisdom that stock markets go to heck in a hand basket when interest rates rise. So, the thinking goes, you'd be better off selling ahead of time before that happens.

No doubt it's tempting to head for the hills with rates at historical lows, but it pays to do your research before you hit the "sell" button.

The three companies I'm going to show you today, for example, can actually benefit from rising rates.

First, let's take an "Econ 101" look at the impact interest rates can have on stocks, especially when rates start rising...

How This Urban Legend Got Started

Like most urban legends, there's a grain of truth when it comes to interest rates and your money. That's because interest rates are quite literally a reflection of the time value of money. When rates are rising, the cost of borrowing goes up. When rates are falling, money gets cheaper.

Economic theory tells us that more expensive money decreases the amount of money in circulation because customers tighten up while cheaper money increases the amount of money at work. That's why the Fed, which subscribes to this theory, has kept rates so low for so long. Team Bernanke and now Team Yellen want to ensure there's money available and, by implication, that people borrow enough to keep it moving and the economy in recovery mode.

Practically speaking, you see this in everything from credit card statements to home mortgages. As rates rise, the propensity to borrow declines and there's less discretionary money spent. But as they fall, consumers head out to spend based in good part on borrowing that has "stimulated" the system. Personally, I think it's a sad state of affairs that debt has become so critical to our way of life, but that's really a story for another time.

What you need to know today is how the relationship I've just described impacts stock prices.

Companies are valued based on earnings. And earnings, in turn, are a function of the time value of money associated with all future cash flows. Loosely speaking, therefore, the more a company earns, the higher the expected stock price is ahead.

Theoretically, if rates rise that means money is getting more expensive so the cost of debt rises and revenue from customers drops. Earnings then take a nose dive and, not surprisingly, so do stock prices which, in turn, makes stock ownership less desirable.

Here's where it gets sticky.

By stimulating the economy and keeping rates so low for so long at the same time, the Fed is clearly fanning inflationary embers while seemingly acting to keep rates low. Every dollar the Fed kicks into the system diminishes the value of every other dollar already out there.

Ultimately rates will have to rise to compensate for the lost value, goes the argument for millions of investors.

Take Winners on the Overlooked Rising Rate Bounce

But here's the thing. You don't just immediately jump from a slight increase in "Treasury yields that's barely noticeable on a ten-year chart to hyperinflation even when it's the worry du jour," according to Jim Cramer in his book Getting Back To Even.

As we talk about so frequently, there has to be growth first. More to the point, there's also got to be a real, meaningful rise in interest rates to affect the markets on anything more than a short- term basis.

Look, you and I both know that rates will eventually rise. That's a harsh reality that our political leaders don't understand, which is why they're constantly kicking the can down the road and spending our country into oblivion.

But pulling your money out of the markets preemptively when we haven't had real interest rate hikes based on growth yet is a mistake. It's one thing to take heed of the lessons that led up to the Financial Crisis and entirely another to fall prey to erroneous conclusions by keeping your finger on the sell button or hitting it too early.

That's not to say the thinking isn't compelling - it is, especially since it's based on the intense emotional distress of the Financial Crisis. It's just not in your best interest. Ask anybody who sat out the rally off March 2009 lows. They've missed an amazing 273% S&P 500 run to new all-time record highs.

And that brings me to what happens when rates actually do rise.

Believe it or not, stocks have rallied for nearly two full years following the first interest rate hike according to Sadoff Investment Management and Fed data.

Here's something else.

Since 1929, the average increase in short-term rates is 107% before the markets falter. Practically speaking, this means the 10-year Treasury yield would have to rise from a July 2012 of 1.53% to 3.16% before we hit the threshold. That's another 61 basis points or 23.9% above where the yield is today, according to Bloomberg.

So how do you invest until then?

Plenty of Great Investment Runway Ahead

First, you miss 100% of the shots you never take, and what I mean by that is that you stand to gain nothing if you aren't in the markets. DALBAR data shows that the average investor may be 200% to 300% behind the markets because they are prematurely trying to time the markets. Ouch!

The Fed has made it very clear that it won't be raising rates until mid-next year at the earliest and only if Yellen gets comfortable with progress in the meantime. So, barring an economic meltdown or global market reset, we've got some runway in front of us.

My preference is definitely for "global challengers" with strong cash flow, experienced management, and powerful brands in the meantime. Examples include ABB Ltd (ADR) (NYSE: ABB), Becton Dickinson and Co. (NYSE: BDX), and American Water Works Company Inc. (NYSE: AWK) that are drawn from our Money Map Report recommendations. Not only are these companies and others like them tapped into global money flows that continue unabated, but these types of companies can actually benefit from rising rates rather than get crushed by them. Remember, earnings... earnings... earnings!

Second, new highs are inevitably accompanied by short-term market noise, so it's not uncommon to get some give and take as the markets digest the implications of record price levels. In fact, I'd bet on it.

Make sure you have trailing stops in place ahead of time to protect profits and your capital in the event there is a hiccup. My suggestion is that 25% below your entry price is a pretty good place to start. You can always tighten that up if you like, but that's really splitting hairs. Protection against the unexpected at all times is the issue. [Editor's Note: You can track your trailing stops much more easily now. Money Morning Members have access to the best deal (in the world) on TradeStops. Learn more.]

If you don't like trailing stops, consider using options or a specialized inverse fund to protect your money and take the sting out of any short-term market movements that catch others by surprise.

Third, you want to be constantly hunting for new opportunities. I am sure your parents instructed you on the importance of "buy low and sell high." So wading in on pullbacks when everybody else is heading for the exits makes sense as a path to bigger profits...

...especially when the markets could run for a lot longer than interest rate doomsters think.

Gilead Sciences: Big Buyback ‘Good Use’ of Sovaldi Windfall

Who’d have thunk it? After lagging for much of the year, Gilead Sciences (GILD) is now outperforming the other big biotech stocks like Amgen (AMGN) and Biogen Idec (BIIB).

Bloomberg

Shares of Gilead have gained 6.4% this year, while Amgen has dropped 0.8% and Biogen Idec has risen 3.6%. The iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) has advanced 1.4% so far this year.

Gilead Sciences big earnings beat has certainly helped, as well as the fact that it lagged earlier this year. Sovaldi, too, looks like the blockbuster everyone expected. And now, Gilead has announced that it’s buying back even more shares. Barclays analyst Ying Huang and team call Gilead’s buyback “a good use of the cash flow generated by Sovaldi.” They explain:

[Gilead]  announced that its Board approved the repurchase of up to $5bn of the company's common stock. This new share repurchase program will expire 3 years after the completion of the current repurchase program…In January 2011 the [Gilead] Board approved the repurchase of $5bn in shares, which has ~$2.9bn left and is expected to be completed by September 2014…However, we expect [Gilead] to accelerate the share repurchase given the recent share weakness and the apparent lack of opportunities in the business development front…In light of the strength of [Gilead's] HIV and HCV franchises, we expect the company to further increase its share buyback at some point in the future.

Shares of Gilead Sciences have gained 1.3% to $79.82 at 11:24 a.m., while Amgen has risen 0.4% to $113.17, Biogen Idec has advanced 1.8% to $289.19 and the iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF is up 1.2% at $230.10.

Thursday, May 28, 2015

Chevron Corporation (CVX) Dividend Stock Analysis

Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Chevron Corporation (CVX). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis: Company Description: Chevron Corporation is a global integrated oil company (formerly ChevronTexaco) has interests in exploration, production, refining and marketing, and petrochemicals.

Fair Value: In calculating fair value, I consider the NPV MMA Differential Fair Value along with these four calculations of fair value, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description: 1. Avg. High Yield Price 2. 20-Year DCF Price 3. Avg. P/E Price 4. Graham Number CVX is trading at a discount to only 3.) above. The stock is trading at a 44.9% premium to its calculated fair value of $82.00. CVX did not earn any Stars in this section. Dividend Analytical Data: In this section there are three possible Stars and three key metrics, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description: 1. Free Cash Flow Payout 2. Debt To Total Capital 3. Key Metrics 4. Dividend Growth Rate 5. Years of Div. Growth 6. Rolling 4-yr Div. > 15% CVX earned two Stars in this section for 2.) and 3.) above. The stock earned a Star as a result of its most recent Debt to Total Capital being less than 45%. CVX earned a Star for having an acceptable score in at least two of the four Key Metrics measured. The company has paid a cash dividend to shareholders every year since 1912 and has increased its dividend payments for 27 consecutive years. Dividend Income vs. MMA: Why would you assume the equity risk and invest in a dividend stock if you could earn a better return in a much less risky money market account (MMA) or Treasury bond? This section compares the earning ability of this stock with a high yield MMA. Two items are considered in this section, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description: 1. NPV MMA Diff. 2. Years to > MMA The NPV MMA Diff. of the $256 is below the $800 target I look for in a stock that has increased dividends as long as CVX has. The stock's current yield of 3.37% exceeds the 3.31% estimated 20-year average MMA rate. Memberships and Peers: CVX is a member of the S&P 500, a Dividend Aristocrat, a member of the Broad Dividend Achievers™ Index and a Dividend Champion. The company's peer group includes: BP plc (BP) with a 4.7% yield, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) with a 2.6% yield and ConocoPhillips (COP) with a 3.9% yield. Conclusion: CVX did not earn any Stars in the Fair Value section, earned two Stars in the Dividend Analytical Data section and did not earn any Stars in the Dividend Income vs. MMA section for a total of two Stars. This quantitatively ranks CVX as a 2-Star Weak stock. Using my D4L-PreScreen.xls model, I determined the share price would need to decrease to $86.39 before CVX's NPV MMA Differential increased to the $800 minimum that I look for in a stock with 27 years of consecutive dividend increases. At that price the stock would yield 4.6%. Resetting the D4L-PreScreen.xls model and solving for the dividend growth rate needed to generate the target $800 NPV MMA Differential, the calculated rate is 5.8%. This dividend growth rate is higher than the 2.6% used in this analysis, thus providing no margin of safety. CVX has a risk rating of 1.50 which classifies it as a Low risk stock. CVX has an impressive business model. Its oil and gas development project pipeline is among the best in the industry with many large, multi-year projects. The company's Myanmar subsidiary was recently awarded exploration rights in Block A5 in the Rakhine basin, off the coast of Myanmar. However, since it operates as an integrated producer, the company is susceptible to downside risk from weakness in the global economy. CVX is reducing its refining footprint and focusing on large, long-lived upstream projects with higher margins and growth potential. As with other large multinationals, the company is finding it increasingly difficult to add reserves. Much of the remaining easily accessible reserves are owned by governments and national oil companies. As a result, CVX is focusing more on deep-water exploration. The company's free cash flow payout continues to to be unfavorable. This is primarily the result of increased capital expenditures (CapX). From 2008 to 2010 CapX averaged $19.7 billion. In 2011 it increased 35% to $26.5 billion, 2012 it was up an additional 17% to $30.9 billion and 2013 was up 25% to $38.0 billion. In addition, CVX had two years of negative free cash flow during the last ten years. The stock is trading at a premium to my $82.00 calculated fair value. Until I see improvement in the free cash flow payout, I will not significantly add to my position. Disclaimer: Material presented here is for informational purposes only. The above quantitative stock analysis, including the Star rating, is mechanically calculated and is based on historical information. The analysis assumes the stock will perform in the future as it has in the past. This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer for more information. Full Disclosure: At the time of this writing, I was long in CVX (2.8% of my Dividend Growth Portfolio). See a list of all my dividend growth holdings here. Related Articles: - United Technologies Corp. (UTX) Dividend Stock Analysis - General Dynamics (GD) Dividend Stock Analysis - Walgreen Co. (WAG) Dividend Stock Analysis - Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) Dividend Stock Analysis - More Stock Analysis

About the author:Dividends4LifeVisit Dividends4Life at: http://www.dividend-growth-stocks.com/
Currently 5.00/512345

Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote)

Voters:
Email FeedsSubscribe via Email RSS FeedsSubscribe RSS Comments Please leave your comment:
More GuruFocus Links
Latest Guru Picks Value Strategies
Warren Buffett Portfolio Ben Graham Net-Net
Real Time Picks Buffett-Munger Screener
Aggregated Portfolio Undervalued Predictable
ETFs, Options Low P/S Companies
Insider Trends 10-Year Financials
52-Week Lows Interactive Charts
Model Portfolios DCF Calculator
RSS Feed Monthly Newsletters
The All-In-One Screener Portfolio Tracking Tool
iPhone App MORE GURUFOCUS LINKS
Latest Guru Picks Value Strategies
Warren Buffett Portfolio Ben Graham Net-Net
Real Time Picks Buffett-Munger Screener
Aggregated Portfolio Undervalued Predictable
ETFs, Options Low P/S Companies
Insider Trends 10-Year Financials
52-Week Lows Interactive Charts
Model Portfolios DCF Calculator
RSS Feed Monthly Newsletters
The All-In-One Screener Portfolio Tracking Tool
CVX STOCK PRICE CHART 123.68 (1y: +7%) $(function(){var seriesOptions=[],yAxisOptions=[],name='CVX',display='';Highcharts.setOptions({global:{useUTC:true}});var d=new Date();$current_day=d.getDay();if($current_day==5||$current_day==0||$current_day==6){day=4;}else{day=7;} seriesOptions[0]={id:name,animation:false,color:'#4572A7',lineWidth:1,name:name.toUpperCase()+' stock price',threshold:null,data:[[1366261200000,115.59],[1366347600000,115.9],[1366606800000,116.57],[1366693200000,117.48],[1366779600000,118.28],[1366866000000,118.51],[1366952400000,120.04],[1367211600000,121.32],[1367298000000,122.01],[1367384400000,120.27],[1367470800000,122.04],[1367557200000,123.49],[1367816400000,123.25],[1367902800000,123.04],[1367989200000,123.36],[1368075600000,123.64],[1368162000000,123.23],[1368421200000,122.85],[1368507600000,125],[1368594000000,123.01],[1368680400000,122.76],[1368766800000,123.42],[1369026000000,124.78],[1369112400000,125.94],[1369198800000,124.93],[1369285200000,125.4],[1369371600000,125.45],[1369717200000,126.43],[1369803600000,125.49],[1369890000000,125.11],[1369976400000,122.75],[1370235600000,124.09],[1370322000000,122.96],[1370408400000,121.57],[1370494800000,120.59],[1370581200000,121.7],[1370840400000,122.69],[1370926800000,121.45],[1371013200000,119.97],[1371099600000,121.66],[1371186000000,120.28],[1371445200000,121.22],[1371531600000,121.52],[1371618000000,120.5],[1371704400000,117.95],[1371790800000,118.93],[1372050000000,116.82],[1372136400000,117.45],[1372222800000,118.15],[1372309200000,118.71],[1372395600000,118.34],[1372654800000,119.08],[1372741200000,119.15],[1372827600000,119.08],[1373000400000,120.51],[1373259600000,121.24],[1373346000000,123.27],[1373432400000,122.9],[1373518800000,123.77],[1373605200000,124.06],[1373864400000,124.68],[1373950800000,124.12],[1374037200000,124.35],[1374123600000,125.47],[1374210000000,126.91],[1374469200000,127.03],[1374555600000,127.26],[1374642000000,126.37],[1374728400000,127.76],[1374814800000,127.56],[1375074000000,126.17],[1375160400000,125.78],[1375246800000,125.89],[1375333200000,126.44],[1375419600000,124.95],[1375678800000,123.99],[1375765200000,123.14],[1375851600000,123.33],[1375938000000,123.07],[1376024400000,122.5],[1376283600000,121.8],[1376370000000,122.5],[1376456400000,122.05],[1376542800! 000,120.25],[1376629200000,119.88],[1376888400000,118.66],[1376974800000,118.29],[1377061200000,117.7],[1377147600000,118.29],[1377234000000,119.53],[1377493200000,118.84],[1377579600000,118.81],[1377666000000,121.81],[1377752400000,120.37],[1377838800000,120.43],[1378184400000,120.55],[1378270800000,120.86],[1378357200000,121.37],[1378443600000,121.21],[1378702800000,122.22],[1378789200000,123.01],[1378875600000,123.92],[1378962000000,123.89],[1379048400000,124.14],[1379307600000,124.08],[1379394000000,124.34],[1379480400000,125.82],[1379566800000,125.44],[1379653200000,124.92],[1379912400000,125.52],[1379998800000,124.49],[1380085200000,124.07],[1380171600000,123.49],[1380258000000,122.64],[1380517200000,121.5],[1380603600000,121.32],[1380690000000,120.83],[1380776400000,118.25],[1380862800000,118.13],[1381122000000,117.87],[1381208400000,116.73],[1381294800000,116.13],[1381381200000,116.38],[1381467600000,117.67],[1381726800000,118.58],[1381813200000,118.15],[1381899600000,119.16],[1381986000000,119.521],[1382072400000,119.65],[1382331600000,119.82],[1382418000000,120.64],[1382504400000,120.13],[1382590800000,120.56],[1382677200000,120.59],[1382936400000,120.91],[1383022800000,121.5],[1383109200000,120.3],[1383195600000,119.96],[1383282000000,118.01],[1383544800000,118.1],[1383631200000,118.45],[1383717600000,121.14],[1383804000000,119.91],[1383890400000,121.19],[1384149600000,121.08],[1384236000000,120],[1384322400000,120.09],[1384408800000,119.56],[1384495200000,120.06],[1384754400000,120.56],[1384840800000,122.06],[1384927200000,122],[1385013600000,123.46],[1385100000000,124.03],[1385359200000,123.74],[1385445600000,122.78],[1385532000000,122.42],[1385704800000,122.44],[1385964000000,122.34],[1386050400000,122.52],[1386136800000,121.77],[1386223200000,121.1],[1386309600000,122.29],[1386568800000,123.34],[1386655200000,123.66],[1386741600000,122.1],[1386828000000,120.99],[1386914400000,119.9],[1387173600000,120.22],[1387260000000,118.74],[1387346400000,121.6],[1387432800000,123.22],[1387519200000,1! 22.78],[1! 387778400000,122.8],[1387864800000,123.51],[1388037600000,124.81],[1388124000000,125.23],[1388383200000,124.23],[1388469600000,124.91],[1388642400000,124.14],[1388728800000,124.35],[1388988000000,124.02],[1389074400000,125.07],[1389160800000,123.29],[1389247200000,123.29],[1389333600000,121.01],[1389592800000,119.25],[1389679200000,119.57],[1389765600000,119.18],[1389852000000,118.83],[1389938400000,119.29],[1390284000000,120.36],[1390370400000,120.43],[1390456800000,118.39],[1390543200000,116.29],[1390802400000,116.43],[1390888800000,116.84],[1390975200000,116],[1391061600000,116.45],[1391148000000,111.63],[1391407200000,111.14],[1391493600000,110.83],[1391580000000,109.52],[1391666400000,111.27],[1391752800000,112.05],[1392012000000,111.69],[1392098400000,113.58],[1392184800000,112.03],[1392271200000,112.51],[1392357600000,113.48],[1392703200000,112.71],[1392789600000,113.6],[1392876000000,114.6],[1392962400000,112.68],[1393221600000,114.15],[1393308000000,114.97],[1393394400000,115.51],[1393826400000,114.84],[1393912800000,115.32],[1393999200000,114.43],[1394085600000,114.85],[1394172000000,115.08],[1394427600000,115.84],[1394514000000,114.51],[1394600400000,115.65],[1394686800000,114.45],[1394773200000,114.1],[1395032400000,115.07],[1395118800000,116.24],[1395205200000,115.2],[1395291600000,115.51],[1395378000000,115.63],[1395637200000,115.85],[1395723600000,117.09],[1395810000000,117.71],[1395896400000,117.67],[1395982800000,118.5],[1396328400000,119],[1396414800000,119.35],[1396501200000,119.04],[1396587600000,118.8],[1396846800000,117.34],[1396933200000,117.8],[1397019600000,119.1],[1397106000000,116.69],[1397192400000,117.03],[1397451600000,118.7],[1397538000000,120.3],[1397624400000,121.83],[1397710800000,123.68],[1397793609000,123.68],[1397793609000,123.68],[1397746830000,123.68]]};var reporting=$('#reporting');Highcharts.setOptions({lang:{rangeSelectorZoom:""}});

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Apple Inc. (AAPL): Can Apple TV Succeed Post Comcast-TWC Deal?

The proposed $45.2 billion acquisition of Time Warner Cable Inc. (NYSE:TWC) by Comcast Corp. (CMCSA) is a mixed bag for Apple, Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) as the implications are not yet clear for new Apple TV.

The deal will merge the largest and the second-largest cable operators in the U.S. Comcast's subscribers will have access to the cloud-based X1 Entertainment Operating System, plus 50,000 video-on-demand choices on television, 300,000 plus streaming choices on XfinityTV.com, Xfinity TV mobile apps that offer 35 live streaming channels plus the ability to download to watch offline later, and the newly launched X1 cloud DVR.

[Related -Will Apple Inc. (AAPL) Join Hands With Tesla Motors Inc (TSLA)?]

Time Warner Cable will combine its products and services with those of Comcast's, including StartOver and LookBack. StartOver allows customers to restart a live program in progress to the beginning while LookBack allows customers to watch programs up to three days after they air live, all without a DVR.

The merger news comes at a time when Apple was reportedly close to strike a content deal with TWC for its revamped Apple TV. Apple TV is nothing but a set-top box that lets users stream movies, TV shows and other content from iTunes and a select set of Internet content providers onto their HD televisions.

[Related -Apple Inc. (AAPL): Quick Update on Apple Color Value Area Targets]

A Bloomberg article suggests that Apple is planning to introduce a new Apple TV for holiday shipment and revives speculation that Apple is working to secure a content deal with TWC after failing to convince programmers and cable operators.

Apple is attempting to develop a device that is capable of delivering both Internet-based and linear multi-channel media as well as its own app store for other useful content.

UBS analyst Steven Milunovich thinks it behoves Apple to unveil a TV product sooner rather than later. TWC's involvement with Apple makes sense to since TWC appears behind in capabilities to develop a cloud-integrated user interface. The Street believed TWC was Cupertino's best chance at an Apple TV partnership.

The latest Comcast-TWC deal puts Apple in a fix as it may have to start over as Comcast is not warm to the idea of Apple TV and the cable TV giant has its own set top box. Obviously, Comcast may not be interested in ceding any part of the Internet TV market to a competitor (and one as big as Apple).

Comcast sets the set-top box bar. Today's X1 features include voice-based navigation and search, personalized recommendations, a collection of customizable widgets, and access to third-party apps such as Facebook, Twitter, and Pandora. Internally referred to as X2, Comcast is in the midst of migrating its X1 users to a next-gen cloud-based device. This upgrade provides cloud-based DVR, mobile device synchronization and app airplay capabilities.

Apple usually does not announce new products for future release (though it did for the original iPhone and iPad). However, Milunovich notes that it is essential that cable operators looking for an outsourced, user-interface solution gain familiarity before committing to potentially exclusive agreements with competing platforms.

For its TV service, Apple's strategy is to partner with cable firms rather than signing deals with media companies. The potential deal with TWC may have given the users of Apple TV option of selecting various live TV. Currently, Apple TV offers channel apps from a few content providers including HBO, Disney, ABC and ESPN. For accessing those services, users should pay for respective cable and satellite providers.

Apple should need to diversify its revenue base as smartphone market is maturing, tablets are losing their initial charm, and iPod growth is falling. Apple does care about share but in "real" smartphones where it is #1 or #2 around the world, not feature phones or smartphones functioning as feature phones.

In addition, the tablet market may be cannibalized by phablets and tablet being a tweener product creates longer upgrade cycles.

Speculation is rampant regarding Apple's new categories. Wearables, most notably the iWatch, appear likely given the hiring of former Nike designers and health experts. Those things face constraints too, due to their battery limitations.

As of now, Apple TV is the best bet for Apple, but without content, it may not get the desired traction. So, the company needs to strike a deal with Comcast if it wants to taste success with Apple TV. Meanwhile, a deal with TWC cannot not be ruled out as the Comcast-TWC deal has to clear massive regulatory hurdles.

The $99 Apple TV, which went on sale in 2007, faces competition from Roku and others. Amazon is also reportedly readying a set-top box.  

Monday, May 25, 2015

Factory Orders Fall on Drop in Demand for Transportation

factory orders fall due to drop in transportationElaine Thompson/AP WASHINGTON -- New orders for U.S. factory goods fell in December, but rose for a third straight month when the volatile transportation sector was excluded, which could ease concerns of an abrupt slowdown in manufacturing activity. The Commerce Department said Tuesday new orders for manufactured goods dropped 1.5 percent, the largest fall since July, weighed down by a plunge in bookings for transportation equipment. November's orders were revised to show a 1.5 percent increase instead of the 1.8 percent gain previously reported. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast new orders received by factories falling 1.7 percent in December. New orders for transportation equipment tumbled 9.7 percent, the largest drop since July, after increasing 8.1 percent in November. Orders for motor vehicles fell by the most in five months. Non-defense aircraft and parts orders fell 17.5 percent. Orders excluding transportation gained 0.2 percent after rising 0.3 percent in November. There were gains in orders for machinery, electrical equipment, appliances and components. Orders for primary metals fell and bookings for computers and electronic products posted their biggest drop since June 2012. Factory activity is expected to slow down early this year after output grew at its fastest pace in nearly two years in the fourth quarter. That will also hold back economic growth after brisk expansion in the second half of the year. The Institute for Supply Management reported Monday that its index of national factory activity dived to an 8-month low in January, with orders recording their largest drop in more than 30 years. But manufacturing isn't slowing as sharply as suggested by the ISM survey, with bad weather accounting for some of the slowdown. There also has been a steady rise in order backlogs. Unfilled orders at the nation's factories rose 0.4 percent in December to their highest level since the series started in 1992 and were up 0.9 percent in November. Economic activity has cooled off a bit in part due to unseasonably cold weather across much of the country and payback after the second half's robust 3.7 percent annual growth pace, which was driven by inventories, consumer spending and trade. The Commerce Department said orders for durable goods, manufactured products expected to last three years or more, dropped 4.2 percent instead of the 4.3 percent fall reported last month. Durable goods orders excluding transportation fell 1.3 percent and not 1.6 percent as previously reported. Orders for non-defense capital goods excluding aircraft -- seen as a measure of business confidence and spending plans -- declined 0.6 percent instead of the previously reported 1.3 percent drop.

Sunday, May 24, 2015

The Most Important Trading Tool That Money CanĂ¢€™t Buy

This is the last part four of my four part series. The biggest mistakes traders and investors make which costs them time, money and usually self-confidence when trading are laid out in in the information below.

This last mistake is the by far the biggest and hardest problem individuals have. Believe it or not, the best way around it is with the use of algorithmic trading strategies which trades for you simply because we cannot mess things up. This is one of the reason automated trading has exploded in the recent years.

The Four Biggest Mistakes

1. Lack Of A Trading Plan – Part I2. Using To Much Leverage – Part II3. Failure to Control Risk – Part III4. Lack Of Self-Discipline – Part IIII

Mistake #4 – Lack Of Discipline, this silent killer is in all of us!

Over the 16 years in which I have been trading and investing, I have never found a person who has not had discipline issues in their trading career. The brutal honest truth you likely do not want to hear is that you will never succeed at trading if you cannot follow a proven trading strategy and all its rules over and over again.

While some individuals just don't have enough discipline to trade, most of us fall victim to fear, greed or our ego causing us to break our trading rules and do silly things with our money or open positions.

Lack of discipline is failing to do what you should do in a given circumstance when trading your strategies. We all know how easy it is to break rules from time to time because our gut feeling is so strong against what our trading strategy is doing but it is a huge mistake to intervene.

How to Avoid Your Lack Of Discipline

There are only three ways that will only help reduce (not eliminate) your lack of discipline.

1. Lose enough money that you now respect the market.

2. You have taken the time to think, create, and test a proven trading strategy that trades within your market philosophy and risk levels. I talk about this in great detail in my book "Technical Trading Mastery – 7 Steps To Win With Logic".

3. You either automate your trading strategies or subscribe to a Automated Trading Strategy that removes you from the equation.

An interesting way to think of trading is not think but react.

The key to defeating your lack of discipline is to create and trade a system that is very simple to execute. And you must have 100% confidence in the system so you do not step in and alter its trading decisions. The key is to react and execute trade first with your proven strategy, and then once you are done you can think about what and why things did what they did all you want.

The last point I want to make, is that if you have your own system it is crucial that you are not tinkering with it all the time. If you keep tinkering with it, then you will never truly know how well it works thus you will second guess its activities and remain an un-disciplined trader.

Four Biggest Mistakes Series Conclusion:

My primary goal of this series has been to show you that there really is only one person who can control your success or failures in trading along with everything else in life. That person is you. In the end you are responsible for everything you have done.

The most common pitfall traders fall into is that when something goes wrong, they blame the market for the loss and not himself.

The key in trading is to accept that you will have losing trades and understand that it is part of this business. And when you lose a trade be sure not to allow these bad experiences have a negative effect on subsequent trades.

So the next time you find you self contemplating breaking a trading rule that has proven to work well over the long run for you, know that if you fall off the discipline train you will instantly be categories as one of those 90% of losing traders kind of guy.

I hope that his series has helped you. If you missed the previous parts, scroll up and use the links within this article near the top for Part I, II and III.

Here are some important resources for conquering these four biggest mistakes:

1. Read my new book "Technical Trading Mastery – 7 Steps To Win With Logic"

2. Take the Trading As Your Business program

3. Complete the Trading System Mastery Program

4. Build your own Automated Trading System with RIZM

5. Or review my All-In-One Automated Trading System

Chris Vermeulen

7 Steps To Win With Logic

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Stores Open for 100 Hours in Final Push to Attract Shoppers

Holiday ShoppingAndrew A. Nelles/AP NEW YORK -- Some stores are ending the holiday shopping season the same way they began it -- with round-the-clock, marathon shopping hours. Kohl's for the first time is staying open for essentially five days straight, from 6 a.m. on Friday through 6 p.m. on Christmas Eve. Macy's (M) and Kmart (SHLD) are opening some of their stores for more than 100 hours in a row from Friday through Christmas Eve. And Toys R Us is staying open for 87 hours straight starting Saturday, which is typically the second biggest shopping day of the year. The expanded hours in the final days before Christmas are reminiscent of how some retailers typically begin the season on the day after Thanksgiving known as Black Friday. The strategy comes as stores try to recoup lost sales during a season that's been hobbled by a number of factors. Despite a recovery economy, many Americans have been struggling with stagnant wages and other issues. On top of that, the time period between the official holiday shopping kickoff on Black Friday and the end of the season is six days shorter than a year ago. That has given Americans less time to shop. Sales at U.S. stores rose 2 percent to $176.7 billion from Nov. 1 through last Sunday, according to ShopperTrak. That's a slower pace than the 2.4 percent increase the Chicago store data tracker expects for the entire two-month season. The disappointing growth pace has put more pressure on retailers to get people into stores in the final days before Christmas. A lot is at stake because they can make up to 40 percent of their revenue in November and December. "It's make or break for the retailers," said C. Britt Beemer, chairman of America's Research Group, a consumer research company. "They have to make up for lost ground." Retailers hope the expanded hours will make it easier for Americans like Peter Sallese, who either stayed out of stores so far because of money problems, inclement weather and other issues. The financial executive from New York City said he's usually finished with shopping by mid-December, but with the shortened season, he fell behind. "Basically, when I came back from Thanksgiving, there was no time," Sallese said. "Add in the snow and the freezing weather, and you didn't feel like shopping." This isn't the first year retailers have used marathon hours to lure shoppers. Toys R Us will open for from 6 a.m. on Saturday to 9 p.m. on Christmas Eve -- the fourth year it's had marathon hours at the end of the season. And this is the third year Kmart has offered round-the-clock hours: The discounter will open a little more than one tenth of its 1,100 stores from 6 a.m. on Friday until 10 p.m. on Christmas Eve. Macy's began testing the 24-hour strategy for back in 2006, but it's made some tweaks this year. Most locations were open for 48 hours straight during the final two days before Christmas last year. But this year, 37 of Macy's 800 stores will be open for 107 hours from 7 a.m. on Friday to 6 p.m. on Christmas Eve. The rest of Macy's locations will be open between 7 a.m. and 2 a.m. from Friday through Monday. And on Christmas Eve, most Macy's stores will open from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. "Our customers love the option to shop late night, overnight and/or first thing in the morning," said Elina Kazan, a Macy's spokeswoman. Percentage of U.S. population who visited in March: 14.2%  Revenue: $73.3 billion  1-year stock price change: 27.56%  Store category: Discount & variety stores

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

The States With The Most (And Least) Affordable Schools

Average in-state tuition at public four-year universities rose by just 2.9% this year, the smallest increase in more than three decades, according to data released last week by College Board. When adjusted for inflation, it has barely increased at all.

In the current school year, the average cost of tuition and fees at a public, four-year institution for an in-state student is $8,093. At a private four-year university, tuition and fees are more than $30,000. With the cost of tuition for private universities still astronomically high, more students may be opting to attend a public school within their home state.

Not all school systems offer the same discount relative to private education. A student attending a public university in his native Wyoming pays an average of just $4,404 in tuition and fees. Meanwhile, a New Hampshire native would spend $14,665 to attend a public university at home. 24/7 Wall St. reviewed the 10 colleges with the highest and lowest average in-state tuition and fees.

It might be assumed that the states with the highest tuition and fees would have the best colleges, but that doesn't appear to be the case. Based on the U.S. News & World Report's ranking of the best public four-year institutions, only four of the states with the highest tuitions have a school in the top 20-ranked universities. Meanwhile, North Carolina and Florida, both of which have among the lowest tuitions have colleges in the top 20.

Some states invest much more in their public institutions than others, and it appears that this translates into lower costs for their students. The two cheapest state university systems, Alaska and Wyoming, each had more than $15,000 in state appropriations per student. By comparison, only two of the 10 most expensive college systems are in the top half, nationally, for per-student appropriations for higher education. In New Hampshire, the most expensive state, appropriations amounted to just $2,482, the lowest spending in the country.

Usually, the cost of in-state tuition at the state's best-known public institution is a good indicator of how much all of its colleges cost. The three most expensive states for in-state tuition also have the three most expensive flagship universities — New Hampshire's UNH, Vermont's UVM, and Pennsylvania's Penn State – University Park. Penn State has an average in-state tuition of $17,926. In contrast, at the 10 least expensive state school systems, only one has a flagship school with in-state tuition and fees of more than $8,000.

One factor that may affect the higher tuition in many of these states is their relative cost of living. It follows that because the states have to pay more in salary and supplies, they would charge students more. In seven of the 10 most expensive public university systems, the relative cost of goods are among the highest in the country. In the states with the least expensive universities, the cost of goods is generally lower, but does not appear to be as much of a factor as it is with the most expensive states.

Some of these states also may charge in-state students less because they levy a high premium on out-of-state undergraduates. In seven of the 10 least expensive states, students from out of state spend more than three times what natives pay in tuition and fees. In North Carolina, out-of-state tuition and fees are $21,352 per year, compared to just $6,514 for in-state residents.

24/7 Wall St. reviewed College Board's 2013 Trends In College Pricing's list of average tuition and fees for in-state students of public colleges and universities for the 2013-2014 school year. We also reviewed from the report current average and historical inflation-adjusted tuition and fees for public two-year and private two- and four-year universities. College Board also provided these figures for each state's flagship university, which is considered the most prestigious public university within the state. From the U.S. Census Bureau's 2012 American Community Survey, we reviewed household income data, as well as the proportion of state adults with a bachelor's degrees. From the Bureau of Economic Analysis, we reviewed the relative cost of consumer goods and services, by state, for 2011. Figures on student debt for the class of 2011 are from The Institute for College Access & Success (TICAS), while 2-year default rates for the 2011 fiscal year from the Department of Education.

These are the states with the most (and least) affordable colleges

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

Time to re-price old clients

practice management, fees

Changing what advisers charge existing clients may be the best way to boost firm profitability, a consultant told advisers at the Financial Services Institute Advisor Summit in Washington yesterday.

Some experienced advisers have increased fees for new clients in recent years after considering all the services they provide, including tasks like restructuring flawed estate plans, helping plan for the care of elderly parents and negotiating mortgages, said Giles Kavanagh, managing director of Pusateri Consulting and Training.

However, a lot of advisers are hesitant and “uncomfortable” about changing the prices they charge their longstanding clients, he said. And that pricing discrepancy is leaving money on the table.

"Re-pricing current clients is the best way to improve your profitability in a justified way," Mr. Kavanagh said.

Advisers should be upfront and tell existing clients they are “correcting” their prices to a fair level after analyzing benchmarking studies, he said. Offer customers a few months to consider the increases and tell them, “We hope you'll come along.”

Mention something about the future, too, he said, suggesting: “Looking forward at your situation and the markets, we believe that our value to you going forward will be even greater.”

Many advisers worry clients don't really appreciate the varied levels of service they offer and fear charging higher prices will reduce asset retention. However, industry surveys suggest otherwise, Mr. Kavanagh said.

“Clients value trust and performance more than price within the overall advisory experience,” he said.

Mr. Kavanagh praised one adviser who addresses the issue of price increases directly with people even before they are clients. She says: “This is my price and it will go up over time.”

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Two Firms Raise Price Target on Dick’s Sporting Goods (DKS)

On Thursday, two firms raised their price targets on sporting goods retailer Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc (DKS).

Credit Suisse reported that it has increased its price target on DKS to $56. This price target suggests a 4% upside from the stock’s current price of $53.56. The firm has also boosted estimates on the company to reflect its updated outlook. Credit Suisse currently has a “Neutral” rating on DKS.

Citigroup also raised its price target on DKS to $63, suggesting a 15% increase from the stock’s current price. Analysts see higher growth opportunities from new stores and higher margins.

Dick’s Sporting Goods shares were up 71 cents, or 1.35%, during Thursday morning trading. The stock is up 17% YTD.

Sunday, May 10, 2015

Investors Become Complacent; Volatility Drops

Volatility in bond and equity markets is back down to levels that would have been familiar to investors back in 2007. Bond and share prices have all moved relentlessly higher, often into uncharted territory.

The only things that have changed for the worse are economic fundamentals.

Growth across developed economies remains subdued and though forecasters are hopeful next year turns out better than this one, that’s still a long way short of the unshakeable optimism most observers felt in the year or two before the financial crisis.

Economic gloom might support high sovereign debt prices, but it’s not so good for equities and corporate bonds. And yes it’s true that a greater share of GDP is accruing to companies than to workers, which at first light is supportive of both corporate debt and share prices. But ultimately the less money people earn the less there is to be recycled into demand, which is bad for firms generally.

Central banks are clearly stitching the whole web together. Weak economies mean central bank liquidity, which supports asset prices, fundamentals notwithstanding.

The problem is that investors have grown convinced nothing can possibly go wrong for them. The VIX, which measures S&P 500 volatility and is popularly called a fear index, is broadly back down to where it was during the boom years–if not quite to those lows. Ditto for the VStoxx volatility index which measures European equity market volatility.

The MOVE index, which measures bond market volatility, has dropped back from the summer’s highs when debt markets were rocked by fears the Federal Reserve would start trimming its bond purchase program by the autumn, and isn’t far off 2007 levels again.

To judge from central banks’ reaction functions, maybe investors have a point. The Fed relented on tapering when equities and bonds wobbled. In effect, the central bank was saying that it is putting a floor under asset prices. As long as investors believe this can be achieved, asset prices will keep climbing.

The key question then is to what degree can central banks achieve this promise? Eventually there will be enough growth to dictate higher interest rates for fear of inflationary consequences. Central banks have to consider where asset prices might be at that point if they maintain their current asymmetric response. Will they abandon price stability for fear of upsetting asset markets? Or will they accept another collapse on the assumption that it won’t be as catastrophic?

Recent history suggests that when asset markets spin out of control–in either direction–central banks find it hard to control them. What investors now have to consider is what might cause asset markets to lose control. Economic fundamentals might yet trump central banking liquidity and government interventions in pricing assets. As they’ve regularly done in Japan over the past two decades.