Sunday, February 2, 2014

Analysis: What’s next for Greece’s economy?

The deep six-year-long depression in Greece appears to be bottoming out.

While the Greek economy is on track to shrink 4% this year, a recovery to flat or modest growth could occur in 2014. The good news is that the government that emerged from the second of two elections in 2012 has been stable and there is no longer talk of Greece exiting the common currency.

But the social cost of the austerity demanded by creditors has been enormous. Living standards have plummeted. Unemployment exceeds 25% and the Greek economy is 25% smaller than it was before the crisis.

Has the adjustment been worth it?

Yannis Ioannides, an economics professor at Tufts University outside Boston, says yes but believes the changes required to restore competitiveness have only just begun. He faults the government for weak leadership and putting the burden of adjustment on the poor instead of the rich, who for example, "are the biggest tax evaders."

"Reforms," says Ioannides, "have been legislated but not implemented." There's been almost no privatization of state assets.

Athens-based economic consultant Miranda Xafa agrees that more reforms are needed. She worries that even if growth resumes next year Greece is not out of the woods.

"The recovery," she says, "is likely to be L-shaped rather than V-shaped as long as private investment remains weak."

Despite hardship, there is reason for cautious optimism. A surprising number of Greeks say the country had lived beyond its means and had to cut back.

Certainly for tourists Greece has become a terrific bargain. Hotel prices are down by at least 20% and greatly reduced public protests have triggered a surge in tourist arrivals. 2013 saw a 15% advance in arrivals and revenue. Advance bookings suggest that another record will be set in 2014. Tourism accounts for 17% of Greek gross domestic product and 20% of employment.

Foreign investors are again poking their toes into distressed Greek assets. Hedge funds are investing in Greek! banks, which have been recapitalized thanks to $50 billion provided by Greece's troika of creditors — the International Monetary Fund, the European Commission, and the European Central Bank.

Prime Minister Antonis Samaras in late November conferred in Berlin with Chancellor Angela Merkel and addressed business leaders. He cautioned creditors not to push for a faster pace of structural reforms.

"You don't climb to the top of a mountain vertically," he said, "you advance from one plateau to another, catch your breath, and then proceed."

Analysts warn that the Samaras government is fragile and could fall if it orders more cutbacks in spending and jobs.

Economics professor Ioannides has turned relatively optimistic. He detects a significant change in Greek public opinion.

"Instead of just blaming outsiders," he says, "Greeks are taking ownership of the problem, recognizing that their economy is inefficient and corrupt and has to change."

What is needed now, he says, "is not for the government to merely take orders from creditors, but to step forward and present a comprehensive plan for growth, like the Irish have done."

With household incomes down by over 30% and house price down even more, there is little doubt that Greek citizens have made huge sacrifices. Jeffrey Anderson, senior analyst for Europe at Washington's Institute of International Finance, hails the Greek adjustment as "unprecedented in economic history."

And yet, further change is needed and the tug of war between the government and creditors continues. Poul Thomsen, the IMF mission chief for Greece, concedes that immense progress has been registered.

But he told the leading Athens newspaper on Nov. 24 that the government must overturn its ban on home foreclosures as wealthy Greeks are abusing the measure, failing to make mortgage payments. He also stressed the need to end "the extreme patronage" in public sector jobs where non-productive, well-paid workers are protected. Thomsen said th! e patrona! ge system deprives well-educated young people of opportunity.

Determined to force action, the troika has delayed its latest report on the Greek economy— and approval of a loan installment -- until mid-December.

Friday, January 31, 2014

Lesson from Amazon's earnings debacle

SAN FRANCISCO — Quarterly earnings this week from Apple, Yahoo, Facebook, Google and Amazon all prompted big stock moves in their wakes, reminding us of both the agony and the ecstasy of owning tech shares.

Yet the big disappointment from Amazon provided arguably the most important lesson for investors.

Namely: Be wary of bullish reports that come late in a quarter, especially those that surface in December.

The week between Christmas and New Year's tends to be a dead one for public companies and news junkies alike, which means any story from a tech giant has a good chance of getting some prominent play both online and in print.

Such was the case on Dec. 27, when Amazon issued a statement that said overall holiday sales and those made through its Amazon Prime delivery service both set records.

The company said then that sales of its Kindle device also set a holiday record, and that Amazon converted more than 1 million harried shoppers into Prime subscribers during the third week of December alone.

All that sure sounded impressive, and the widely-reported news helped to raise expectations about Amazon's fourth-quarter results, as well as its prospects for 2014.

What the company didn't say then was that its shipping costs rose 19 percent in the fourth quarter, putting a big damper on the benefit from all those additional Amazon Prime sales.

Only now do investors know just how much those extra sales hurt the company's bottom line, as Amazon barely missed Wall Street's revenue expectations yet missed per-share profit estimates by almost 50 percent.

The Seattle-based ecommerce giant this week also issued a disappointing first-quarter forecast, while adding that it might have to raise the price of its Amazon Prime service by as much as $40.

That news helped drive its stock down as much as 10 percent Friday.

Taken together, the large shortfall in profit on sales that were only slightly worse than expected, along with the move to raise prices, s! trongly suggest that the company took a loss on at least some of its Amazon Prime sales as delivery costs rose.

The take-away for mom-and-pop investors is this: While big-money growth investors will hold their noses and keep supporting the stock despite Amazon's razor-thin profit margins, they won't support incremental sales growth that flat out hurts the company's bottom line.

Big post-earnings stock moves are nothing new for Amazon, of course. Its stock dropped as much as 8 percent last April the day after a lackluster report, then came roaring back in the second half of last year.

But Friday's stock drop came on very heavy trading volume, with more than 11 million shares trading hands by midday Friday, compared to average volume of less than 3 million shares.

With the shares still up almost 90 percent over the past two years, many on Wall Street may be tempted to take some profits off the table now that one of the company's growth drivers, namely Amazon Prime, has been shown to be a drag on earnings growth.

And next year, investors big and small may want to view any bullish holiday-season news from Amazon with a bit more skeptical eye.

John Shinal has covered tech and financial markets for 15 years at Bloomberg, BusinessWeek, the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch, Wall Street Journal Digital Network and others. Follow him on Twitter: @johnshinal.